Todays newsletter continues chapter 5 from Bitcoin: A Work in Progress.
Assume Valid is a block hash that’s encoded in the software. More specifically, it’s a hash of a block from just before the last major release. Many Bitcoin Core developers publicly verify this hash, and anyone on GitHub can see the hash, and they can check for themselves whether or not the hash is real.
If you’re a new user and you start Bitcoin Core, it’ll sync all the headers and get all the blocks. And if that particular hash is in the chain, it won’t verify any signatures that came before it. It’ll still verify everything else, e.g. that the proof-of-work is valid and that no coins are created out of thin air. Skipping signature verification mainly saves CPU usage, and this speeds up the whole process.
The Assume Valid mechanism is different from a checkpoint, in that a node doesn’t require that the hash occurs in the blockchain. If your node sees another branch of the blockchain without this hash, and if it has more proof-of-work, it’ll consider that other branch first. The only difference is that it will verify the signatures for that other branch, so it’ll take a bit longer.
What does it mean to not check signatures for blocks before the Assume Valid hash? It means that if somebody stole a coin, i.e. spent a UTXO with an invalid signature, your node wouldn’t notice. But if someone created a coin out of thin air, your node would still see that.
This is where the transparency of source code becomes an important factor. If there ever was a theft of coins that Bitcoin Core developers wanted to cover up, they’d only be able to trick new nodes. First, the developers would have to produce a block that steals coins by using an invalid signature. Such a block would be considered invalid by all existing nodes. Then, they’d take this invalid block, or a descendant, and use its hash as Assume Valid.
Anyone who already runs a node would be able to see this hash on GitHub and check it against their own node. They’d then either not see the block at all, or their node would point out that it’s invalid (because of the invalid signature). Both would be reason to sound the alarm. Barring some immense social media censorship campaign, anyone about to download a new node might learn what’s going on.
But the hypothetical malicious developers have another problem. No miners are building on top of their invalid block, because the miners already had their node software installed before the invalid hash was produced. Within hours of the developers publishing this hash, and long before they release any software for download, miners have already produced a longer chain that doesn’t include this stealing block. So even if a user didn’t notice the social media drama, their node would simply follow the longest chain. It’d be a bit slower because it couldn’t use the Assume Valid feature, but it’d be fine.
So, what if developers colluded with miners in the theft? If a majority of miners decide to work with the developers and continue building on the invalid stealing block, then they’d be able to trick new users. But they wouldn’t be able to trick existing users, which is generally the vast (economic) majority. Massive drama and probably massive economic losses for these miners would ensue, as no exchange would accept their deposit.
But what if developers, miners, and all existing users conspire to trick new users? Such a conspiracy seems impossible to coordinate secretly. But if you do worry the world is out to get you, rest assured that you can turn the Assume Valid feature off by starting your node with
-assumevalid=0. Your node would then notice the invalid stealing block, you would yourself see its hash in the source code, and you could run to streets protesting the situation.
What’s important to understand here is that developers can already collude against you and sneak bad things into the code — we’ll talk more about that in chapter 9. Developers could also put in a backdoor that gives them access to your private keys. This actually happened with an altcoin called Lucky7Coin. These backdoors could be very carefully hidden in the code in a way that only very skilled developers could detect. The Assume Valid hash, on the other hand, is very clearly visible, and it requires very little skill to verify, as explained above. This is why the Bitcoin Core developers believe that this feature is safe against abuse.
Assume Valid has been in Bitcoin Core since v0.14 (2017), and now there’s a new proposal: AssumeUTXO, which we'll cover next week.